Radeon 780M vs RX 7900 XTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 XTX and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7900 XTX
2022
24 GB GDDR6, 355 Watt
80.46
+340%

RX 7900 XTX outperforms 780M by a whopping 340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8297
Place by popularity6147
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.58no data
Power efficiency15.7084.44
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 November 2022 (2 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144768
Core clock speed1929 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2498 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)355 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate959.2129.6
Floating-point processing power61.39 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs19232
TMUs38448
Ray Tracing Cores9612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length287 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XTX 80.46
+340%
Radeon 780M 18.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 XTX 31046
+340%
Radeon 780M 7057

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7900 XTX 83322
+552%
Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7900 XTX 148746
+257%
Radeon 780M 41622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7900 XTX 64680
+711%
Radeon 780M 7977

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7900 XTX 211480
+340%
Radeon 780M 48105

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7900 XTX 758139
+76.4%
Radeon 780M 429810

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RX 7900 XTX 367
+447%
Radeon 780M 67

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RX 7900 XTX 360
+233%
Radeon 780M 108

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RX 7900 XTX 400
+451%
Radeon 780M 73

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RX 7900 XTX 536
+590%
Radeon 780M 78

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RX 7900 XTX 187
+276%
Radeon 780M 50

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RX 7900 XTX 347
+447%
Radeon 780M 63

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RX 7900 XTX 322
+1007%
Radeon 780M 29

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

RX 7900 XTX 553
+581%
Radeon 780M 81

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD255
+589%
37
−589%
1440p178
+709%
22
−709%
4K107
+664%
14
−664%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.92no data
1440p5.61no data
4K9.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 242
+521%
39
−521%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 166
+305%
40−45
−305%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 283
+843%
30−33
−843%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+307%
60−65
−307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+224%
35−40
−224%
Cyberpunk 2077 231
+645%
31
−645%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+174%
40−45
−174%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+310%
45−50
−310%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+118%
110−120
−118%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 280−290
+217%
90−95
−217%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+146%
60−65
−146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+153%
45−50
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+483%
60−65
−483%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+77%
85−90
−77%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 330
+705%
40−45
−705%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 241
+703%
30−33
−703%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+307%
60−65
−307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+224%
35−40
−224%
Cyberpunk 2077 208
+767%
24
−767%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+174%
40−45
−174%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+310%
45−50
−310%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+118%
110−120
−118%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 280−290
+217%
90−95
−217%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+146%
60−65
−146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+153%
45−50
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 535
+891%
54
−891%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+321%
40−45
−321%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+77%
85−90
−77%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 134
+227%
40−45
−227%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210
+600%
30−33
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+224%
35−40
−224%
Cyberpunk 2077 199
+765%
23
−765%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+174%
40−45
−174%
Forza Horizon 4 295
+157%
110−120
−157%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 406
+666%
53
−666%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 471
+924%
46
−924%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 298
+928%
29
−928%
Watch Dogs: Legion 158
+778%
18
−778%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+153%
45−50
−153%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+374%
35−40
−374%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+300%
27−30
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 132
+595%
18−20
−595%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 171
+969%
16−18
−969%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+310%
20−22
−310%
Cyberpunk 2077 141
+1310%
10−11
−1310%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+300%
21−24
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+171%
100−105
−171%
Hitman 3 110−120
+436%
21−24
−436%
Horizon Zero Dawn 328
+786%
35−40
−786%
Metro Exodus 146
+329%
30−35
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 360
+1025%
32
−1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 238
+1090%
20
−1090%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+118%
110−120
−118%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+313%
30−33
−313%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+393%
14−16
−393%
Hitman 3 70−75
+421%
14−16
−421%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+140%
90−95
−140%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+616%
18−20
−616%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+1113%
15
−1113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110
+900%
10−12
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107
+1089%
9−10
−1089%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+808%
24−27
−808%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 197
+1059%
17
−1059%
Watch Dogs: Legion 103
+1188%
8−9
−1188%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+494%
16−18
−494%

This is how RX 7900 XTX and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is 589% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 709% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 664% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 2267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900 XTX surpassed Radeon 780M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 80.46 18.29
Recency 3 November 2022 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 355 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7900 XTX has a 339.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2266.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3490 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1447 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.