RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 GRE with RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 7900 GRE
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
69.94
+66.8%

RX 7900 GRE outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation66.16no data
Power efficiency18.5225.11
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31no data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date27 July 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204608
Core clock speed1287 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2245 MHzno data
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate718.4no data
Floating-point processing power45.98 TFLOPSno data
ROPs160no data
TMUs320no data
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length276 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 GRE 69.94
+66.8%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 41.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 GRE 26889
+66.8%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16124

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7900 GRE 67134
+128%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7900 GRE 54610
+161%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7900 GRE 247366
+199%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD209
+74.2%
120−130
−74.2%
1440p131
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
4K81
+80%
45−50
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.63no data
1440p4.19no data
4K6.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+73.7%
95−100
−73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 208
+73.3%
120−130
−73.3%
Elden Ring 179
+79%
100−105
−79%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+73.7%
95−100
−73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 92
+67.3%
55−60
−67.3%
Forza Horizon 4 487
+67.9%
290−300
−67.9%
Metro Exodus 149
+75.3%
85−90
−75.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%
Valorant 350−400
+67.6%
210−220
−67.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+73.7%
95−100
−73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
Dota 2 164
+72.6%
95−100
−72.6%
Elden Ring 270−280
+68.8%
160−170
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 100
+81.8%
55−60
−81.8%
Fortnite 270−280
+71.9%
160−170
−71.9%
Forza Horizon 4 403
+67.9%
240−250
−67.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+72.6%
95−100
−72.6%
Metro Exodus 138
+72.5%
80−85
−72.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+79.2%
120−130
−79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+74%
100−105
−74%
Valorant 350−400
+67.6%
210−220
−67.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+74.4%
160−170
−74.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+73.7%
95−100
−73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+85%
40−45
−85%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+76%
75−80
−76%
Forza Horizon 4 353
+68.1%
210−220
−68.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+79.2%
120−130
−79.2%
Valorant 350−400
+67.6%
210−220
−67.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 130
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
Elden Ring 180−190
+68.2%
110−120
−68.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 130
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
World of Tanks 450−500
+69.3%
290−300
−69.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+68.4%
95−100
−68.4%
Forza Horizon 4 252
+68%
150−160
−68%
Metro Exodus 128
+70.7%
75−80
−70.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+73.3%
90−95
−73.3%
Valorant 300−350
+68.9%
180−190
−68.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
Dota 2 151
+67.8%
90−95
−67.8%
Elden Ring 95−100
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 151
+67.8%
90−95
−67.8%
Metro Exodus 71
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+74.2%
120−130
−74.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 151
+67.8%
90−95
−67.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+82%
50−55
−82%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+75%
60−65
−75%
Fortnite 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Valorant 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%

This is how RX 7900 GRE and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 74% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 75% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 80% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 69.94 41.94
Recency 27 July 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 115 Watt

RX 7900 GRE has a 66.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has 126.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 859 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.