UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.95no data
Power efficiency16.54no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 32Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3456192
Core clock speed1435 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2544 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate549.524.00
Floating-point processing power35.17 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs963
TMUs21624
Ray Tracing Cores54no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2023 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7700 XT has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, on the other hand, has 1533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7700 XT and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1418 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.