RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600M
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
10.21

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RX 7600M by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.9154.32
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17926144
Core clock speed1500 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed2410 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate269.9299.5
Floating-point processing power17.27 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores2848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M 10.21
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.55
+434%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M 3940
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21042
+434%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
−429%
450−500
+429%
1440p36
−428%
190−200
+428%
4K24
−400%
120−130
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%
Hitman 3 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−418%
290−300
+418%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−369%
300−310
+369%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%
Hitman 3 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−418%
290−300
+418%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 185
−414%
950−1000
+414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−369%
300−310
+369%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%
Hitman 3 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−418%
290−300
+418%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 157
−410%
800−850
+410%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
−432%
500−550
+432%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−369%
300−310
+369%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−422%
240−250
+422%
Hitman 3 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−362%
300−310
+362%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−423%
230−240
+423%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%

This is how RX 7600M and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 429% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 428% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.21 54.55
Recency 4 January 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 434.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.