Riva TNT2 vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M XT with Riva TNT2, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600M XT
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
34.23
+342200%

RX 7600M XT outperforms Riva TNT2 by a whopping 342200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1521524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.55no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameNavi 33NV5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)12 October 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1280 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed2469 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate316.00.25
Floating-point processing power20.23 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1282
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s2.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 34.23
+342200%
Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 13186
+439433%
Riva TNT2 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119-0−1
1440p57-0−1
4K33-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139 0−1
Battlefield 5 95−100 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 0−1
Hitman 3 60−65 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 237 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114 0−1
Battlefield 5 95−100 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 0−1
Hitman 3 60−65 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 0−1
Metro Exodus 142 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 208 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180 0−1
Hitman 3 60−65 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 140 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 0−1
Hitman 3 35−40 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 106 0−1
Metro Exodus 92 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 0−1
Hitman 3 24−27 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 0−1
Metro Exodus 99 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 22 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.23 0.01
Recency 4 January 2023 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 250 nm

RX 7600M XT has a 342200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 23 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook card while Riva TNT2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIA Riva TNT2
Riva TNT2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 71 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 18 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.