NVS 4200M vs Radeon RX 7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 with NVS 4200M, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.76
+5758%

RX 7600 outperforms NVS 4200M by a whopping 5758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking891157
Place by popularity64not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.13no data
Power efficiency18.702.11
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNavi 33GF119
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204848
Core clock speed1720 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate339.86.480
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.76
+5758%
NVS 4200M 0.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16499
+5793%
NVS 4200M 280

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600 114647
+4889%
NVS 4200M 2298

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600 43430
+8466%
NVS 4200M 507

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD145
+1015%
13
−1015%
1440p73
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
4K370−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 148
+4833%
3−4
−4833%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6700%
2−3
−6700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+3800%
3−4
−3800%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6533%
3−4
−6533%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1473%
10−12
−1473%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+6500%
2−3
−6500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+2533%
6−7
−2533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+329%
30−35
−329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+6700%
2−3
−6700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
+3233%
3−4
−3233%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6533%
3−4
−6533%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1473%
10−12
−1473%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+6500%
2−3
−6500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230
+3733%
6−7
−3733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+770%
10−11
−770%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+329%
30−35
−329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2733%
3−4
−2733%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+2900%
3−4
−2900%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6533%
3−4
−6533%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Horizon Zero Dawn 172
+1464%
10−12
−1464%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+3217%
6−7
−3217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+1130%
10−11
−1130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+329%
30−35
−329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+6400%
1−2
−6400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+7667%
3−4
−7667%
Hitman 3 55−60
+833%
6−7
−833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Metro Exodus 118
+5800%
2−3
−5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+6350%
2−3
−6350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+9950%
2−3
−9950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+2333%
3−4
−2333%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 35−40 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Metro Exodus 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

This is how RX 7600 and NVS 4200M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 1015% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 7200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600 is 10300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600 surpassed NVS 4200M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.76 0.73
Recency 24 May 2023 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 25 Watt

RX 7600 has a 5757.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 4200M, on the other hand, has 560% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 4200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while NVS 4200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1740 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 128 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.