GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs Radeon RX 7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88not rated
Place by popularity86not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.34no data
Power efficiency17.98no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)17 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048240
Core clock speed1720 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate339.851.84
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12880
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length204 mm275 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1152 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s147.5 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.12x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2023 17 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 315 Watt

RX 7600 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 90.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 X2
GeForce GTX 285 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1791 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.