GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.96no data
Power efficiency17.89no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1720 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Wattno data
Texture fill rate339.8no data
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm

RX 7600 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1923 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.