Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile vs RX 6950 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.08no data
Power efficiency15.08no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 21Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120320
Core clock speed1925 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2324 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)335 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate743.728.00
Floating-point processing power23.8 TFLOPS0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs1288
TMUs32020
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2022 6 January 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 335 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6950 XT has an age advantage of 2 years.

Graphics 320SP Mobile, on the other hand, has 2133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6950 XT and Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2702 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.