Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6900 XT and Arc A380, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6900 XT
2020
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
69.43
+331%

RX 6900 XT outperforms Arc A380 by a whopping 331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking23334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.8844.00
Power efficiency15.8614.72
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 21DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A380 has 47% better value for money than RX 6900 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed1825 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate720.0131.2
Floating-point processing power23.04 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32064
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm222 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6900 XT 69.43
+331%
Arc A380 16.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6900 XT 26749
+331%
Arc A380 6207

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6900 XT 59119
+326%
Arc A380 13892

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6900 XT 50587
+397%
Arc A380 10174

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD196
+317%
47
−317%
1440p130
+333%
30−35
−333%
4K81
+350%
18−20
−350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.103.17
1440p7.684.97
4K12.338.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 117
+91.8%
61
−91.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
+238%
50
−238%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+129%
95−100
−129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+95.1%
60−65
−95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+74.6%
65−70
−74.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+124%
75−80
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+45.1%
160−170
−45.1%
Hitman 3 120−130
+108%
60−65
−108%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+91.7%
130−140
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+53.5%
100−110
−53.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+184%
100−110
−184%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 279
+288%
72
−288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 142
+284%
37
−284%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+129%
95−100
−129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+95.1%
60−65
−95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+74.6%
65−70
−74.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+124%
75−80
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+45.1%
160−170
−45.1%
Hitman 3 120−130
+108%
60−65
−108%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+91.7%
130−140
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+53.5%
100−110
−53.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+266%
80
−266%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+137%
60−65
−137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 98
+238%
29
−238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 137
+342%
31
−342%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+95.1%
60−65
−95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+74.6%
65−70
−74.6%
Forza Horizon 4 248
+335%
57
−335%
Hitman 3 120−130
+108%
60−65
−108%
Horizon Zero Dawn 283
+444%
52
−444%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+380%
61
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+382%
34
−382%
Watch Dogs: Legion 121
+384%
25
−384%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+62.7%
75−80
−62.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+195%
55−60
−195%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+147%
45−50
−147%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99
+219%
30−35
−219%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
+252%
30−35
−252%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+138%
30−35
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+363%
16−18
−363%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+141%
30−35
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+58.5%
170−180
−58.5%
Hitman 3 100−110
+181%
35−40
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 224
+261%
60−65
−261%
Metro Exodus 117
+105%
55−60
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190−200
+190%
65−70
−190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+223%
35−40
−223%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+49.4%
160−170
−49.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+128%
50−55
−128%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+200%
27−30
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Hitman 3 83
+246%
24−27
−246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+51.7%
140−150
−51.7%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122
+259%
30−35
−259%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+258%
18−20
−258%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+288%
16−18
−288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+194%
16−18
−194%
Forza Horizon 4 162
+295%
40−45
−295%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+189%
35−40
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+286%
14−16
−286%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+188%
24−27
−188%

This is how RX 6900 XT and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6900 XT is 317% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6900 XT is 333% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6900 XT is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 444% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed Arc A380 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 69.43 16.11
Recency 28 October 2020 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 75 Watt

RX 6900 XT has a 331% higher aggregate performance score, and a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3764 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 838 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.