Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 22Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560640
Core clock speed2116 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2390 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate382.444.00
Floating-point processing power12.24 TFLOPS1.408 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs16040
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6800M has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 866.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6800M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 308 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 52 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.