Radeon RX 7900M vs RX 6750 XT

Place in the ranking	47	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	51.75	no data
Power efficiency	15.05	22.60
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)	19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4608
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2090 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	416.0	601.9
Floating-point processing power	13.31 TFLOPS	38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	192
TMUs	160	288
Ray Tracing Cores	40	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 53.97

RX 7900M 58.38
+8.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20818

RX 7900M 22519
+8.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6750 XT 48327

RX 7900M 59943
+24%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6750 XT 37609

RX 7900M 50241
+33.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 +1.2%	163 −1.2%
1440p	88 −40.9%	124 +40.9%
4K	51 −78.4%	91 +78.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.33	no data
1440p	6.24	no data
4K	10.76	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

165

−3%

170−180
+3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −6.3%	110−120 +6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −6.4%	180−190 +6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	127 −2.4%	130−140 +2.4%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −6.2%	130−140 +6.2%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −2.3%	220−230 +2.3%
Hitman 3	110−120 −4.4%	110−120 +4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −4.8%	210−220 +4.8%
Metro Exodus	150−160 −2%	150−160 +2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −8%	220−230 +8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −2.1%	140−150 +2.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −6.3%	110−120 +6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −6.4%	180−190 +6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	109 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −6.2%	130−140 +6.2%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −2.3%	220−230 +2.3%
Hitman 3	110−120 −4.4%	110−120 +4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −4.8%	210−220 +4.8%
Metro Exodus	150−160 −2%	150−160 +2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	304 +32.8%	220−230 −32.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −6.3%	110−120 +6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −2.1%	140−150 +2.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −6.3%	110−120 +6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	98 −2%	100−105 +2%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −2.3%	220−230 +2.3%
Hitman 3	110−120 −4.4%	110−120 +4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210 −3.8%	210−220 +3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260 −32.3%	344 +32.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	135 −24.4%	168 +24.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	98 −50%	140−150 +50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−2.7%

110−120
+2.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −9.8%	120−130 +9.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −7.2%	85−90 +7.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −6.6%	65−70 +6.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −7.8%	65−70 +7.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −6.3%	65−70 +6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −6.3%	65−70 +6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 −1.5%	270−280 +1.5%
Hitman 3	75−80 −8%	80−85 +8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	158 +16.2%	130−140 −16.2%
Metro Exodus	126 +26%	100−105 −26%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	186 −33.9%	249 +33.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −9.1%	95−100 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 −2.2%	220−230 +2.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

−6.5%

95−100
+6.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −8.5%	60−65 +8.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%
Hitman 3	45−50 −6.7%	45−50 +6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 −2.3%	210−220 +2.3%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −9.2%	80−85 +9.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 −46.8%	116 +46.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −10%	40−45 +10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −10.5%	40−45 +10.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −7.9%	40−45 +7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −10%	85−90 +10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	99 −32.3%	131 +32.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	41 +24.2%	30−35 −24.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−7.7%

55−60
+7.7%

This is how RX 6750 XT and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 1% faster in 1080p
RX 7900M is 41% faster in 1440p
RX 7900M is 78% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 33% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
RX 7900M is ahead in 62 tests (94%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	53.97	58.38
Recency	3 March 2022	19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	180 Watt

RX 7900M has a 8.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6750 XT and Radeon RX 7900M.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.