RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6700M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700M with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6700M
2021
10 GB GDDR6, 135 Watt
35.21
+36.8%

RX 6700M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.0618.76
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 22GA106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1489 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz1358 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6108.6
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Cores3620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB4 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 35.21
+36.8%
RTX A2000 Mobile 25.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700M 13587
+36.8%
RTX A2000 Mobile 9929

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6700M 33497
+85.5%
RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6700M 66973
+5.1%
RTX A2000 Mobile 63738

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6700M 27924
+112%
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6700M 91672
+51.9%
RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6700M 8989
+79.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 5016

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+53.8%
78
−53.8%
1440p55−60
+27.9%
43
−27.9%
4K50−55
+25%
40
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−23.3%
74
+23.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+33.9%
55−60
−33.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98
+78.2%
55
−78.2%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+34.5%
80−85
−34.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+36.5%
50−55
−36.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−3.3%
62
+3.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+30.5%
55−60
−30.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+21.6%
140−150
−21.6%
Hitman 3 111
+113%
50−55
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+27.4%
110−120
−27.4%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+30.7%
85−90
−30.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+51.5%
65−70
−51.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+42.5%
85−90
−42.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+17.3%
100−110
−17.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+33.9%
55−60
−33.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 82
+110%
39
−110%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+34.5%
80−85
−34.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+36.5%
50−55
−36.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+20%
50
−20%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+30.5%
55−60
−30.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+21.6%
140−150
−21.6%
Hitman 3 96
+84.6%
50−55
−84.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+27.4%
110−120
−27.4%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+30.7%
85−90
−30.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
+37.9%
65−70
−37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+72.2%
108
−72.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+17.3%
100−110
−17.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+33.9%
55−60
−33.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+122%
32
−122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+36.5%
50−55
−36.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+46.3%
41
−46.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+30.5%
55−60
−30.5%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+21.6%
140−150
−21.6%
Hitman 3 90
+73.1%
50−55
−73.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+27.4%
110−120
−27.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170
+80.9%
94
−80.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+90%
50
−90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
+121%
29
−121%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88
+33.3%
65−70
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+34.7%
45−50
−34.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+37%
27
−37%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4%
25
−4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+35.4%
140−150
−35.4%
Hitman 3 40−45
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+39.6%
50−55
−39.6%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+34.7%
49
−34.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+30.2%
63
−30.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+24.5%
140−150
−24.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+39.5%
40−45
−39.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Hitman 3 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+28.2%
130−140
−28.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+48.3%
27−30
−48.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+24.2%
33
−24.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+31.4%
35
−31.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%

This is how RX 6700M and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700M is 54% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700M is 28% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700M is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700M is 122% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700M is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.21 25.73
Recency 31 May 2021 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 95 Watt

RX 6700M has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 42.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6700M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 123 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 92 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.