Arc A380M vs Radeon RX 6700M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.14no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 22DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)24 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1489 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6128.0
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores368

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-A (3.1)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB6 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 24 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 35 Watt

RX 6700M has a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A380M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6700M and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 123 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.