GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6650M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
39.06

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms RX 6650M by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11334
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.07
Power efficiency22.5425.70
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924352
Core clock speed2068 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate270.6344.8
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs112136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Cores2834

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650M 39.06
RTX 4060 Ti 59.38
+52%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M 15074
RTX 4060 Ti 22913
+52%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD121
−48.8%
180−190
+48.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 127
−49.6%
190−200
+49.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−51.9%
120−130
+51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−51.8%
290−300
+51.8%
Hitman 3 80−85
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−48.1%
240−250
+48.1%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−47.9%
210−220
+47.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−48.4%
190−200
+48.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−51.9%
120−130
+51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−51.9%
120−130
+51.9%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−51.8%
290−300
+51.8%
Hitman 3 80−85
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−48.1%
240−250
+48.1%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190
−47.4%
280−290
+47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−48.4%
190−200
+48.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−51.9%
120−130
+51.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−51.8%
290−300
+51.8%
Hitman 3 80−85
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−48.1%
240−250
+48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
−49.7%
250−260
+49.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−44.4%
130−140
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−46.7%
110−120
+46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−44.1%
85−90
+44.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−37%
300−310
+37%
Hitman 3 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−50.7%
110−120
+50.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−51.8%
85−90
+51.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
−51.8%
290−300
+51.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−49.2%
270−280
+49.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

This is how RX 6650M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 49% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.06 59.38
Recency 4 January 2022 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 160 Watt

RX 6650M has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 52% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6650M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 94 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7786 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.