Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.00no data
Power efficiency18.59no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23Rialto Bridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204820480
Core clock speed2055 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2635 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate337.32,048
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs1281280
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed2190 MHz3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 800 Watt

RX 6650 XT has 354.5% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max NEXT, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6650 XT and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3169 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.