Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) vs Radeon RX 6600M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking136not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.94no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179264
Core clock speed2068 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2416 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate270.6no data
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

RX 6600M has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6600M and Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 994 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 50 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.