Radeon PRO W7900 vs RX 6600

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
39.31

PRO W7900 outperforms RX 6600 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11012
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.9116.63
Power efficiency20.7618.04
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 October 2021 (3 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 has 308% better value for money than PRO W7900.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17926144
Core clock speed1626 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed2491 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate279.0958.1
Floating-point processing power8.928 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs112384
Ray Tracing Cores2896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm280 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 39.31
PRO W7900 76.35
+94.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 15164
PRO W7900 29456
+94.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
−93%
220−230
+93%
1440p57
−93%
110−120
+93%
4K31
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.8918.18
1440p5.7736.35
4K10.6166.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 107
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−92.8%
160−170
+92.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
−85.8%
210−220
+85.8%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−90.5%
240−250
+90.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
−86.8%
170−180
+86.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−85.6%
180−190
+85.6%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−83.2%
350−400
+83.2%
Hitman 3 99
−91.9%
190−200
+91.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−90.5%
240−250
+90.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−84.8%
170−180
+84.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−88.8%
270−280
+88.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−93.8%
250−260
+93.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−92.8%
160−170
+92.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
−84.8%
170−180
+84.8%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−90.5%
240−250
+90.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
−91.8%
140−150
+91.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−85.6%
180−190
+85.6%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−83.2%
350−400
+83.2%
Hitman 3 95
−89.5%
180−190
+89.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−90.5%
240−250
+90.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−84.8%
170−180
+84.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 182
−92.3%
350−400
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−85.2%
150−160
+85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−93.8%
250−260
+93.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−92.8%
160−170
+92.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
−92.3%
150−160
+92.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−83.2%
350−400
+83.2%
Hitman 3 86
−86%
160−170
+86%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
−90.1%
270−280
+90.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 157
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−84.8%
170−180
+84.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−86.7%
140−150
+86.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−83.3%
110−120
+83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−84.8%
85−90
+84.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−88.9%
85−90
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−81.8%
400−450
+81.8%
Hitman 3 54
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
−86.3%
190−200
+86.3%
Metro Exodus 97
−85.6%
180−190
+85.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
−88.1%
190−200
+88.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
−82.3%
350−400
+82.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−94%
130−140
+94%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Hitman 3 36
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−92.3%
350−400
+92.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−90%
95−100
+90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%

This is how RX 6600 and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 93% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 93% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 94% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.31 76.35
Recency 13 October 2021 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 295 Watt

RX 6600 has 123.5% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 94.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9319 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 73 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.