Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile vs Radeon RX 6550M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.57no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed2000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2840 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate181.858.00
Floating-point processing power5.816 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs3220
TMUs6440
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6550M has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6550M and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6550M is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 149 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 25 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.