GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 vs Radeon RX 6550M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.95no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 24G98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed2000 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed2840 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,400 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate181.82.320
Floating-point processing power5.816 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs644
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4MXM-I
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 13 Watt

RX 6550M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS DDR2, on the other hand, has 515.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6550M and GeForce 9300M GS DDR2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS DDR2
GeForce 9300M GS DDR2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 152 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.