ROG Ally Extreme GPU vs Radeon RX 6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking275not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation53.24no data
Power efficiency26.41no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed1923 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2321 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate111.4129.6
Floating-point processing power3.565 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Cores1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Lengthno data280 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 13 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 30 Watt

ROG Ally Extreme GPU has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 76.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6400 and ROG Ally Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU
ROG Ally Extreme GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1834 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate ROG Ally Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.