Radeon RX 6300 vs RX 6300M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6300M with Radeon RX 6300, including specs and performance data.

RX 6300M
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
16.50
+13.7%

RX 6300M outperforms RX 6300 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.8831.62
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed2000 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate115.297.92
Floating-point processing power3.686 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Cores1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6300M 16.50
+13.7%
RX 6300 14.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6300M 6421
+13.7%
RX 6300 5648

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Valorant 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Dota 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Fortnite 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+17%
100−105
−17%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Valorant 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
World of Tanks 200−210
+15.6%
180−190
−15.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Dota 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+17%
100−105
−17%
Valorant 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+21.5%
130−140
−21.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
World of Tanks 110−120
+16%
100−105
−16%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Valorant 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Dota 2 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Fortnite 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.50 14.51
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 32 Watt

RX 6300M has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 6300, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6300M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.