Radeon RX 6300M vs RX 6600

Place in the ranking	112	325
Place by popularity	15	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	67.78	no data
Power efficiency	20.71	33.10
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 23	Navi 24
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	13 October 2021 (3 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	768
Core clock speed	1626 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	2491 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	132 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.0	115.2
Floating-point processing power	8.928 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	48
Ray Tracing Cores	28	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	190 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 39.30
+136%

RX 6300M 16.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 15161
+136%

RX 6300M 6422

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	113 +151%	45−50 −151%
1440p	57 +138%	24−27 −138%
4K	31 +158%	12−14 −158%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.91	no data
1440p	5.77	no data
4K	10.61	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

107
+5250%

2−3

−5250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +2667%	3−4 −2667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	113 +151%	45−50 −151%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +152%	50−55 −152%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +3850%	2−3 −3850%
Cyberpunk 2077	91 +4450%	2−3 −4450%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +143%	35−40 −143%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +143%	40−45 −143%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +139%	80−85 −139%
Hitman 3	99 +2375%	4−5 −2375%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1938%	8−9 −1938%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +152%	50−55 −152%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +163%	35−40 −163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +3475%	4−5 −3475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +361%	27−30 −361%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +2667%	3−4 −2667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 +163%	35−40 −163%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +152%	50−55 −152%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +3850%	2−3 −3850%
Cyberpunk 2077	73 +3550%	2−3 −3550%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +143%	35−40 −143%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +143%	40−45 −143%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +139%	80−85 −139%
Hitman 3	95 +2275%	4−5 −2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1938%	8−9 −1938%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +152%	50−55 −152%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +163%	35−40 −163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	182 +4450%	4−5 −4450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +800%	9−10 −800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +361%	27−30 −361%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +2667%	3−4 −2667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +160%	30−33 −160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +3850%	2−3 −3850%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +2850%	2−3 −2850%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +143%	35−40 −143%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +139%	80−85 −139%
Hitman 3	86 +2050%	4−5 −2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	142 +1675%	8−9 −1675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	157 +3825%	4−5 −3825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90 +900%	9−10 −900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	58 +107%	27−30 −107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+163%

35−40

−163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +150%	30−33 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +150%	24−27 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +163%	16−18 −163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	52 +148%	21−24 −148%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	34	0−1
Far Cry 5	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +144%	90−95 −144%
Hitman 3	54 +800%	6−7 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	102 +5000%	2−3 −5000%
Metro Exodus	97 +143%	40−45 −143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	101 +153%	40−45 −153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +138%	24−27 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +140%	80−85 −140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+3250%

2−3

−3250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Hitman 3	36 +157%	14−16 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +143%	75−80 −143%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +144%	18−20 −144%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +180%	5−6 −180%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +157%	21−24 −157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 +152%	21−24 −152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21 +163%	8−9 −163%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+1650%

2−3

−1650%

This is how RX 6600 and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

RX 6600 is 151% faster in 1080p
RX 6600 is 138% faster in 1440p
RX 6600 is 158% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6600 is 5250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6600 surpassed RX 6300M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.30	16.65
Recency	13 October 2021	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	132 Watt	35 Watt