GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6300
2 GB GDDR6, 32 Watt
14.62

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RX 6300 by a whopping 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3686
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.10
Power efficiency31.3219.90
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688448
Core clock speed1000 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate97.92689.0
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Cores1266

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6300 14.62
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.73
+466%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6300 5619
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31800
+466%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−470%
228
+470%
1440p24−27
−525%
150
+525%
4K14−16
−521%
87
+521%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.50
1440pno data5.33
4Kno data9.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 189
+0%
189
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 197
+0%
197
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 189
+0%
189
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+0%
196
+0%
Far Cry 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 172
+0%
172
+0%
Far Cry 5 197
+0%
197
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 196
+0%
196
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 430
+0%
430
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150
+0%
150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 188
+0%
188
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210
+0%
210
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Metro Exodus 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+0%
182
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how RX 6300 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 470% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 525% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 521% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.62 82.73
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 285 Watt

RX 6300 has 790.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 465.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3404 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6300 or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.