Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Radeon RX 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 21DG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096768
Boost clock speed1635 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate418.679.20
Floating-point processing power13.39 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs9624
TMUs25648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 25 Watt

RX 5900 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5900 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5900
Radeon RX 5900
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 208 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.