RTX A4500 Embedded vs Radeon RX 5900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.66
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43525888
Core clock speedno data510 MHz
Boost clock speed1735 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate471.9223.6
Floating-point processing power15.1 TFLOPS14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs272184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 80 Watt

RX 5900 XT has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A4500 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5900 XT and RTX A4500 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
RTX A4500 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.