GeForce Go 6200 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.15no data
Power efficiency13.58no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 20NV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23047
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt16 Watt
Texture fill rate155.11.200
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s4.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 16 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

Go 6200, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 580 Mobile and GeForce Go 6200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.