GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile and GeForce GT 520M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
19.44
+2527%

RX 580 Mobile outperforms GT 520M by a whopping 2527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2881161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.530.01
Power efficiency13.334.23
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 20GF108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)5 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 $59.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 Mobile has 235200% better value for money than GT 520M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230448
Core clock speed1000 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate155.14.800
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 Mobile 19.44
+2527%
GT 520M 0.74

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 Mobile 15223
+2932%
GT 520M 502

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p210−220
+2525%
8
−2525%
Full HD77
+542%
12
−542%
1200p180−190
+2471%
7
−2471%
4K30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.925.00
4K10.0659.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%
Hitman 3 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+800%
10−12
−800%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+200%
30−35
−200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%
Hitman 3 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+800%
10−12
−800%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+200%
30−35
−200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%
Hitman 3 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+800%
10−12
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+200%
30−35
−200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2775%
4−5
−2775%
Hitman 3 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+5950%
2−3
−5950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+2575%
4−5
−2575%
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and GT 520M compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 Mobile is 2525% faster in 900p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 542% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 2471% faster in 1200p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 2900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 580 Mobile is 5950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 Mobile surpassed GT 520M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 0.74
Recency 18 April 2017 5 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 12 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 2527% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 520M, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 411 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.