Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Radeon RX 5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.63no data
Power efficiency14.29no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 10Liverpool 16nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041152
Core clock speed1465 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate248.457.60
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length268 mm288 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1*
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2019 7 September 2016
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt

RX 5700 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5700 and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1887 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 157 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700 or Playstation 4 Slim GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.