CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Radeon RX 5700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking119not rated
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.60no data
Power efficiency14.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044480
Core clock speed1465 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate248.4394.8
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs144280
Tensor Coresno data280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length268 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s1,493 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2019 1 September 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 250 Watt

RX 5700 has 38.9% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5700 and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1726 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.