Quadro NVS 160M vs Radeon RX 570

Place in the ranking	305	1289
Place by popularity	22	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.00	no data
Power efficiency	10.33	2.00
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	G98
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	15 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$169	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	8
Core clock speed	1168 MHz	580 MHz
Boost clock speed	1244 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	159.2	4.640
Floating-point processing power	5.095 TFLOPS	0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	128	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-I
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 570 18.08
+5066%

NVS 160M 0.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 570 6967
+5061%

NVS 160M 135

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	82 +8100%	1−2 −8100%
1440p	49	0−1
4K	29	0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.06	no data
1440p	3.45	no data
4K	5.83	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30
+1300%

2−3

−1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +1967%	3−4 −1967%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33	0−1
Battlefield 5	106 +5200%	2−3 −5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Far Cry 5	80 +7900%	1−2 −7900%
Far Cry New Dawn	85 +8400%	1−2 −8400%
Forza Horizon 4	257 +6325%	4−5 −6325%
Hitman 3	35−40 +775%	4−5 −775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Metro Exodus	101 +10000%	1−2 −10000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120 +2900%	4−5 −2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +207%	27−30 −207%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	94 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33	0−1
Battlefield 5	98 +9700%	1−2 −9700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	63 +3050%	2−3 −3050%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Far Cry 5	69 +6800%	1−2 −6800%
Far Cry New Dawn	61 +6000%	1−2 −6000%
Forza Horizon 4	255 +6275%	4−5 −6275%
Hitman 3	35−40 +775%	4−5 −775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Metro Exodus	82 +8100%	1−2 −8100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +356%	9−10 −356%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +207%	27−30 −207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +2150%	2−3 −2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Far Cry 5	46	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	75 +7400%	1−2 −7400%
Hitman 3	35−40 +775%	4−5 −775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +378%	9−10 −378%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +207%	27−30 −207%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	61 +6000%	1−2 −6000%
Far Cry New Dawn	41	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11	0−1
Far Cry 5	30	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	149 +7350%	2−3 −7350%
Hitman 3	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
Metro Exodus	48	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +5300%	2−3 −5300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+1400%

2−3

−1400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	21	0−1
Hitman 3	12−14	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +9200%	1−2 −9200%
Metro Exodus	29	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	15	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	39	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+700%

2−3

−700%

This is how RX 570 and NVS 160M compete in popular games:

RX 570 is 8100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 570 is 3300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 570 surpassed NVS 160M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.08	0.35
Recency	18 April 2017	15 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	12 Watt

RX 570 has a 5065.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 160M, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 160M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 160M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.