GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143not rated
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.59no data
Power efficiency16.29no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNavi 10GF116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304144
Core clock speed1130 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate224.617.28
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS0.4147 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs14424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s38.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GT 640 OEM Rebrand, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2758 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.