Quadro K2200M vs Radeon RX 560 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 Mobile with Quadro K2200M, including specs and performance data.

RX 560 Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
11.28
+25.8%

RX 560 Mobile outperforms K2200M by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.67no data
Power efficiency14.069.46
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameBaffinGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2017 (7 years ago)19 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896640
Core clock speed1175 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9726.68
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+43.3%
30−35
−43.3%
4K36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.33no data
4K2.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how RX 560 Mobile and K2200M compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 Mobile is 43% faster in 1080p
  • RX 560 Mobile is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.28 8.97
Recency 5 January 2017 19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

RX 560 Mobile has a 25.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile
Radeon RX 560 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 54 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.