Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX 5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500M and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5500M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
14.42
+43.8%

RX 5500M outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking357446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.24no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140896
Core clock speed1375 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate144.8no data
Floating-point processing power4.632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs88no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500M 14.42
+43.8%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.03

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5500M 12276
+146%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
1440p56
+60%
35−40
−60%
4K31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+60%
35−40
−60%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+48.4%
30−35
−48.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+165%
20−22
−165%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+40.9%
65−70
−40.9%
Hitman 3 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Horizon Zero Dawn 146
+170%
50−55
−170%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+111%
27−30
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 169
+53.6%
110−120
−53.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 34
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 48
+140%
20−22
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+40.9%
65−70
−40.9%
Hitman 3 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Horizon Zero Dawn 144
+167%
50−55
−167%
Metro Exodus 36
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82
+156%
30−35
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 168
+52.7%
110−120
−52.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+40.9%
65−70
−40.9%
Hitman 3 50
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 54
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+65.9%
40−45
−65.9%
Hitman 3 33
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 163
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Hitman 3 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+54.8%
40−45
−54.8%
Metro Exodus 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how RX 5500M and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500M is 63% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500M is 60% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500M is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5500M is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5500M is ahead in 33 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.42 10.03
Recency 7 October 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

RX 5500M has a 43.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The Radeon RX 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.