GeForce2 Go 100 vs Radeon RX 5500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking243not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.38no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 14NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)6 February 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speedno data125 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate162.40.5
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs884

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)7.0
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 2 Watt

RX 5500 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 100, on the other hand, has 5400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop card while GeForce2 Go 100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 214 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.