Radeon RX 480 Mobile vs RX 5500 XT
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 232 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 95 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.79 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | Polaris (2016−2019) |
| GPU code name | Navi 14 XTX | Polaris |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 December 2019 (4 years ago) | 1 August 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $450 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1408 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,400 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 162.4 | 155.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 5.196 gflops | 4.963 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 180 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 December 2019 | 1 August 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
RX 480 Mobile, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX 480 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while Radeon RX 480 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
