Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking231not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.04no data
Power efficiency12.67no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 14Liverpool 16nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 December 2019 (4 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081152
Core clock speed1607 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate162.457.60
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Length180 mm288 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1*
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2019 7 September 2016
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 75 Watt

RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has 73.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2819 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.