GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500 XT and GeForce GTX 770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5500 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.72
+54%

RX 5500 XT outperforms GTX 770 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking238347
Place by popularity97not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.964.25
Power efficiency12.564.61
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNavi 14GK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 December 2019 (5 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500 XT has 1005% better value for money than GTX 770.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081536
Core clock speed1607 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt230 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate162.4138.9
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS3.333 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs88128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mm267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system powerno data600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s224.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
PhysX-+
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.72
+54%
GTX 770 15.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9121
+54.1%
GTX 770 5920

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5500 XT 14305
+75.5%
GTX 770 8150

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 5500 XT 44516
+147%
GTX 770 17999

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RX 5500 XT 42245
+138%
GTX 770 17717

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+71.1%
45−50
−71.1%
1440p42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
4K25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.19
+304%
8.87
−304%
1440p4.02
+267%
14.78
−267%
4K6.76
+269%
24.94
−269%
  • RX 5500 XT has 304% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT has 267% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT has 269% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 66
+65%
40−45
−65%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+56%
50−55
−56%
Elden Ring 78
+56%
50−55
−56%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+62.2%
45−50
−62.2%
Counter-Strike 2 50
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+60%
35−40
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 133
+56.5%
85−90
−56.5%
Metro Exodus 99
+65%
60−65
−65%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+54.3%
70−75
−54.3%
Valorant 139
+54.4%
90−95
−54.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+62.2%
45−50
−62.2%
Counter-Strike 2 41
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Dota 2 112
+60%
70−75
−60%
Elden Ring 94
+56.7%
60−65
−56.7%
Far Cry 5 43
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Fortnite 120−130
+60%
75−80
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+54.3%
70−75
−54.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+56.7%
60−65
−56.7%
Metro Exodus 66
+65%
40−45
−65%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+60%
95−100
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Valorant 84
+68%
50−55
−68%
World of Tanks 250−260
+57.5%
160−170
−57.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+62.2%
45−50
−62.2%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Dota 2 143
+58.9%
90−95
−58.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+60%
95−100
−60%
Valorant 114
+62.9%
70−75
−62.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 44
+63%
27−30
−63%
Elden Ring 51
+70%
30−33
−70%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+63%
27−30
−63%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+58.2%
110−120
−58.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
World of Tanks 150−160
+58%
100−105
−58%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+65%
40−45
−65%
Metro Exodus 60
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Valorant 91
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Dota 2 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Elden Ring 20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+60%
45−50
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 78
+56%
50−55
−56%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Fortnite 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Valorant 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

This is how RX 5500 XT and GTX 770 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500 XT is 71% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT is 56% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.72 15.40
Recency 12 December 2019 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 230 Watt

RX 5500 XT has a 54% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2990 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1650 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.