Quadro NVS 285 vs Radeon RX 480
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 247 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.62 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.29 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | NV44 A2 |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Design | reference | no data |
| Release date | 29 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 6 June 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $27.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | no data |
| Compute units | 36 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 275 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 75 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 | 1.100 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.834 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 2 |
| TMUs | 144 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | n/a | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| HDMI | 2.0 | - |
| DisplayPort support | 1.4HDR | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | n/a | - |
| CrossFire | + | - |
| Enduro | n/a | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | n/a | - |
| LiquidVR | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TressFX | + | - |
| TrueAudio | n/a | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| Mantle | n/a | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2016 | 6 June 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 18 Watt |
RX 480 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.
NVS 285, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 480 and Quadro NVS 285. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 480 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
