FirePro S9170 vs Radeon RX 480

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.64no data
Power efficiency10.32no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameEllesmereHawaii
GCN generation4th Genno data
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 July 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042816
Compute units36no data
Core clock speed1120 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1266 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate182.3163.7
Floating-point processing power5.834 TFLOPS5.238 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144176

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI2.0-
DisplayPort support1.4HDR-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationn/a-
CrossFire+-
Enduron/a-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3Dn/a-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudion/a-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantlen/a-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2016 8 July 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 275 Watt

RX 480 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 83.3% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9170, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 480 and FirePro S9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 480 is a desktop card while FirePro S9170 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
AMD FirePro S9170
FirePro S9170

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1789 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.