Radeon RX 6650M XT vs RX 470 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
18.16

RX 6650M XT outperforms RX 470 Mobile by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29982
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.56no data
Power efficiency15.4126.60
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameEllesmereNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed926 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1074 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate137.5309.2
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−134%
75−80
+134%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−142%
150−160
+142%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−127%
100−105
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
280−290
+137%
Hitman 3 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+218%
27−30
−218%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−134%
75−80
+134%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−142%
150−160
+142%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−127%
100−105
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
280−290
+137%
Hitman 3 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+378%
9−10
−378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+218%
27−30
−218%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−134%
75−80
+134%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−127%
100−105
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
280−290
+137%
Hitman 3 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+378%
9−10
−378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+218%
27−30
−218%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−136%
85−90
+136%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−140%
250−260
+140%
Hitman 3 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−143%
85−90
+143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−137%
90−95
+137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−139%
270−280
+139%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Hitman 3 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−137%
230−240
+137%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 470 Mobile surpassed RX 6650M XT in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.16 44.24
Recency 4 August 2016 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 120 Watt

RX 470 Mobile has 41.2% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 143.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 58 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.