P106-090 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
18.20
+199%

RX 470 Mobile outperforms P106-090 by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking303583
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.97no data
Power efficiency14.675.56
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameEllesmereGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)31 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed926 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1074 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate137.573.49
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPS2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs12848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%
Hitman 3 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+230%
27−30
−230%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%
Hitman 3 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+230%
27−30
−230%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%
Hitman 3 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+230%
27−30
−230%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+247%
30−33
−247%
Hitman 3 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+223%
35−40
−223%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Hitman 3 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+223%
30−33
−223%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.20 6.08
Recency 4 August 2016 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 75 Watt

RX 470 Mobile has a 199.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

P106-090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while P106-090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 49 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.