Quadro VX 200 vs Radeon R9 M485X
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 458 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 3 (2014−2016) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Amethyst | G92 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 8 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 112 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 754 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2.961 gflops | 0.252 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 229 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 May 2016 | 8 January 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
R9 M485X has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
VX 200, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M485X and Quadro VX 200. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook card while Quadro VX 200 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
