GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M470 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M470
2016
4 GB GDDR5
6.05
+83.9%

R9 M470 outperforms GTX 260M SLI by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking585743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.51
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameEmeraldNB9E-GTX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)2 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768224
Core clock speed900 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz950 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R9 M470 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M470 surpassed GTX 260M SLI in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.05 3.29
Recency 15 May 2016 2 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R9 M470 has a 83.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M470
Radeon R9 M470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
GeForce GTX 260M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.