GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon R9 M395

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395 with GeForce GTX 560, including specs and performance data.

R9 M395
2015
4 GB GDDR5
12.73
+78.3%

R9 M395 outperforms GTX 560 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking387540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.75
Power efficiencyno data3.43
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792336
Core clock speed834 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data99 °C
Texture fill rateno data45.36
Floating-point processing powerno data1.089 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.016x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.44.1
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395 12.73
+78.3%
GTX 560 7.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M395 4911
+78.3%
GTX 560 2754

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M395 6819
+125%
GTX 560 3030

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+100%
40−45
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.73 7.14
Recency 9 June 2015 17 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R9 M395 has a 78.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M395 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1046 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.