GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs Radeon R9 M395

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M395
2015
4 GB GDDR5
12.79
+4026%

R9 M395 outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 4026% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

R9 M395 R9 M395
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4041328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.77
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)no data
GPU code nameno dataMCP79MX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179216
Core clock speed834 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million282 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210.0
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Valorant 100−110
+308%
24−27
−308%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+1215%
12−14
−1215%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Dota 2 80−85
+710%
10−11
−710%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Valorant 100−110
+308%
24−27
−308%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Dota 2 80−85
+710%
10−11
−710%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Valorant 100−110
+308%
24−27
−308%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+4400%
2−3
−4400%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Valorant 120−130
+4200%
3−4
−4200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 60−65
+3100%
2−3
−3100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395 is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M395 surpassed 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.79 0.31
Recency 9 June 2015 14 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R9 M395 has a 4025.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M395 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395
vs
GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
HD 6310 Radeon HD 6310
R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395
vs
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
7950 GT AGP NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT AGP
vs
RTX A5000 Max-Q A5000 Max-Q
RX 5950 XT Radeon RX 5950 XT
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB 2080 Ti 12 GB
RX 580 AMD Radeon RX 580
vs
W5130M FirePro W5130M
R7 M370 AMD Radeon R7 M370
vs
R5 M315 R5 M315
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Max-Q
HD 7410M AMD Radeon HD 7410M
vs
Instinct MI300X Radeon Instinct MI300X
Pro W6800 AMD Radeon Pro W6800
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU
HD 7670A AMD Radeon HD 7670A
vs
R7 240 R7 240
R9 M395 AMD Radeon R9 M395
vs
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
R9 M395 AMD Radeon R9 M395
vs
GTX 760M GTX 760M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395 or GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.