Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R9 M390

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390 with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

R9 M390
2015
2 GB GDDR5
10.05
+114%

R9 M390 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking444641
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.70
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code namePitcairnIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+117%
18−20
−117%
4K21
+133%
9−10
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Hitman 3 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Hitman 3 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Hitman 3 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+125%
8−9
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Hitman 3 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+140%
5−6
−140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

This is how R9 M390 and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • R9 M390 is 117% faster in 1080p
  • R9 M390 is 133% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.05 4.70
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

R9 M390 has a 113.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 357 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.