GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M375

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M375 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M375
2015
4 GB DDR3
2.51

RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms R9 M375 by a whopping 843% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking831238
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiencyno data21.63
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTropoGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speed1015 MHz1057 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate40.6067.65
Floating-point processing power1.299 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs4064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M375 2.51
RTX 3050 Mobile 23.67
+843%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M375 969
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+841%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M375 3314
RTX 3050 Mobile 21358
+544%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 M375 8275
RTX 3050 Mobile 77234
+833%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M375 1667
RTX 3050 Mobile 15685
+841%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M375 8466
RTX 3050 Mobile 90224
+966%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−304%
93
+304%
1440p5−6
−900%
50
+900%
4K3−4
−1000%
33
+1000%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2020%
106
+2020%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 75
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2500%
75−80
+2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1560%
83
+1560%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−786%
60−65
+786%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Hitman 3 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3950%
80−85
+3950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−300%
80−85
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 62
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2500%
75−80
+2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−786%
60−65
+786%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Hitman 3 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3950%
80−85
+3950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1018%
123
+1018%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−104%
50−55
+104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 53
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Hitman 3 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−435%
107
+435%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−864%
106
+864%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−400%
65
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−91.9%
71
+91.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−933%
60−65
+933%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hitman 3 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1014%
78
+1014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−864%
130−140
+864%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 19
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 69
+0%
69
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+0%
78
+0%
Hitman 3 34
+0%
34
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
+0%
45
+0%

This is how R9 M375 and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 304% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 1000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 3950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.51 23.67
Recency 5 May 2015 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Mobile has a 843% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M375 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R9 M375
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5
56 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
4607 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.