ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs HD 7770M

Place in the ranking	731	878
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.26
Power efficiency	7.36	2.25
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Chelsea	Redwood
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)	14 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	400
Core clock speed	675 MHz	775 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	64 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	15.50
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	32	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770M 3.42
+63.6%

ATI HD 5670 2.09

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7770M 2110
+43.7%

ATI HD 5670 1468

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7770M 10468
+59%

ATI HD 5670 6584

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	40−45 +53.8%	26 −53.8%
Full HD	50−55 +56.3%	32 −56.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.72

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Elden Ring	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Valorant	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Dota 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Elden Ring	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Fortnite	18−20 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +55%	20−22 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Valorant	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
World of Tanks	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Dota 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +55%	20−22 −55%
Valorant	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Elden Ring	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
World of Tanks	24−27 +84.6%	12−14 −84.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Valorant	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Fortnite	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Valorant	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

This is how HD 7770M and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:

HD 7770M is 54% faster in 900p
HD 7770M is 56% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7770M is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 7770M is ahead in 44 tests (88%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.42	2.09
Recency	24 April 2012	14 January 2010
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	64 Watt

HD 7770M has a 63.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5670 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.