ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs R9 M370X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M370X with Radeon HD 2900 GT, including specs and performance data.

R9 M370X
2015
2 GB GDDR5
4.03
+430%

R9 M370X outperforms ATI HD 2900 GT by a whopping 430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6901151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.35
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCape VerdeR600
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 May 2015 (9 years ago)6 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640240
Core clock speed800 MHz601 MHz
Number of transistors1500 Million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.212
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2885 TFLOPS
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M370X 4.03
+430%
ATI HD 2900 GT 0.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M370X 1554
+432%
ATI HD 2900 GT 292

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
+433%
6−7
−433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+438%
8−9
−438%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+471%
7−8
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+438%
8−9
−438%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+700%
1−2
−700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+438%
8−9
−438%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1

This is how R9 M370X and ATI HD 2900 GT compete in popular games:

  • R9 M370X is 433% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 0.76
Recency 19 May 2015 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

R9 M370X has a 430.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M370X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2900 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M370X is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2900 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M370X
Radeon R9 M370X
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Radeon HD 2900 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 54 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.